![]() It is noteworthy that it removes HTTPS when it uninstalls and reinstalls it, but it does not detect HTTPS scanning again when it receives VPS updates.Īpparently not only for avast 8 and below, support for 18 and below versions has been cut off, the VPS packages you provided are causing problems. I am satisfied with the avast 11 version, I use it. However, in avast version 9 and above, HTTPS traffic does not work properly. That is, if I install with the latest 2020 setup file of avast, HTTPS detection works fine. The problem is a bilateral problem, but it seems to be avast. I discussed this issue with firefox officers. I noticed that after version 8 and below support was cut, mozilla firefox HTTPS traffic is not working properly.įor example, clicking on test viruses is no problem in HTTP And it should rapidly restore all features that were in the SOA to the Avast Business Pro console. It should come completely clean about what it does with information collected from paying customers. The company cannot afford any further missteps. The company is probably very close to a tipping point in terms of loss or business as a result of this. Many people in the industry who had previously promoted Avast as one of the better anti-malware products have changed their positions as a result of this scandal. ![]() Given recent public disclosures regarding Avast's abuse of the personal information it has collected about users (at least those using the free version), I would suggest that the company be very careful and diligent about only taking such steps as will improve its standing among its customer base. ![]() I should not have to monitor events on a website manned largely by volunteers on a daily basis to find out this kind of thing. But I doubt that is what stopped them from directly notifying its business customers of the date when they would stop supporting the older product. If people want to encourage rapid uptake of new versions, they need to make sure the new versions don't remove features that people rely on.ĬOVID may be affecting the efficiency of Avast's operations, and I am sympathetic because it is affecting my operation in a very serious way. This is a primary reason why I have only been using Avast Business Pro with Windows 10 devices, because Endpoint Protection Plus won't work with that operating system. The console is missing several features that were available in the SOA and this has made the system more time consuming for me to use. the SOA for Endpoint Protection Plus, new is definitely not better. In the case of the management console for Avast Business Pro vs. So as I wrote elsewhere, it slows down the development and release of updated protection for the new program versions. Those old program versions have less sensors, and they use different formats, so the code in the virus definitions gets complicated - and subsequently buggy (and of course takes longer time to write, and longer time to test). The program provides a lot of functionality for the virus definitions (you could imagine the program being an array of sensors feeding information into the virus definition code where it gets evaluated, plus also providing "executive functions" that can be called when a decision was made. Some 3rd party libraries may have to stay on old (possibly buggy or insecure) versions because the new/fixed ones cannot even be compiled with that old compiler anymore. That code has to be compiled with an old compiler (to work in those old programs), so it cannot use any new(er) features (that may have a performance or security impact). A big part of virus definitions are simply code - just like the program itself, only loaded from a newly created/updated folder every day. It's not about the distribution, it's about their actual creation or implementation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |